Disadvantages of website updating

Before CMSs, people would hand-code their websites on their local computers and used an FTP program to move those files to their webserver, and then these files would become available on their websites.

If they needed to modify something, they had to go through the whole process again.

Because of its popularity, it typically comes at the top of the list for consideration.

If you’re currently thinking of moving your website to a new CMS, here’s what we consider are the benefits and drawbacks of migrating to Word Press.

Frequent updates can be made to web pages, blogs, photo galleries and more.

Google’s Blogger is a basic content management system which has no cost to setup and while it is useful for a personal site, it has limited value as a business site.

A static web page (sometimes called a flat page/stationary page) is a web page that is delivered to the user exactly as stored, in contrast to dynamic web pages which are generated by a web application.

Consequently, a static web page displays the same information for all users, from all contexts, subject to modern capabilities of a web server to negotiate content-type or language of the document where such versions are available and the server is configured to do so.

Word Press’s market share varies quite widely according to the source you choose to believe.

A CMS is a dynamic website which is designed to be scalable in at least its content, and most often its features.

The user is empowered to update content at their leisure and usually without any concern for breaking the website layout as this is usually under tight control of the CMS itself.

But with estimates ranging from 38% to 70%, it is still undeniably the most popular website content management system (CMS) and sits way ahead of its competitors.

And it’s been voted the best CMS for the 7th year running too.


Leave a Reply